Web13 sep. 2016 · Whilst looking for a clean solution we found this article on CodeProject: The article had covered much of the implementation you need, but left some gaps you need to plug yourself for a thread-safe list which I have included below along with some of the useful methods you’d find on List: Thread-safe Enumerator Thread-safe List … Web8 mei 2011 · The best thing would be if your data is immutable then you have automatic thread safety but if you are bound to a collection which count does change you have a …
c# - IEnumerable thread safety? - Stack Overflow
Web15 jun. 2024 · The interface IEnumerable is not thread safe. See the documentation on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s793z9y2.aspx, which states: An enumerator … Web12 apr. 2024 · Viewed 52k times. 27. I have a Generic List as below. public static readonly List Customers = new List (); I'm using the below methods for it: .Add .Find .FirstOrDefault. The last 2 are LINQ extensions. I'd need to make this thread-safe to be able to run multiple instances of the container class. flavored french toast
Thread-Safe collections Microsoft Learn
Web15 jun. 2024 · Are IEnumerable Linq methods thread-safe? 13,600 Solution 1 The interface IEnumerable is not thread safe. See the documentation on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/s793z9y2.aspx, which states: An enumerator remains valid as long as the collection remains unchanged. Web16 jun. 2024 · This is certainly doable by creating a custom IEnumerable object with perhaps an integer index, but only if you can control all access to your IList<> object (for locking and maintaining the state of your enumeration). But multithreaded programming is a tricky business under the best of circumstances, and this is a complex probablem. Share Web7 mei 2014 · IEnumerable doesn't define modifying methods, but it doesn't mean that access operators are thread safe ( GetEnumerator, MoveNext and etc.) Simplest example: GetEnumerator implemented as this: Every time returns same instance of … flavored frothed milk