Theoretical paper's referee report
WebbTechnical sophistication alone is not sufficient grounds for publication in the Annals of Statistics. Quality of writing and presentation. Papers should be well written and their material and achievements clearly presented. They should make proper reference to the existing literature and should have an accurate and appropriate bibliography. WebbBelow, we provide a list of concepts and thoughts that referees can consider when writing a referee report. We divide the list into six main categories: sufficiency of contribution, …
Theoretical paper's referee report
Did you know?
Webb18 feb. 2011 · This paper presents a conceptual model of referee efficacy, defines the concept, proposes sources of referee specific efficacy information, and suggests consequences of having high or low referee efficacy. Referee efficacy is defined as the extent to which referees believe they have the capacity to perform successfully in their job. WebbA referee hunch that theoretical or empirical results are wrong is not a scholarly argument against a paper’s conclusions. Instead, as referee you must provide scientifically based reasons whyyou suspect the results are not correct.
WebbTheoretical Economics Submitting a paper To submit a paper to Theoretical Economics , The submitting author must be a member of the Econometric Society The submitting author must pay a submission fee with the exceptions noted below. The fee is 100 USD for regular members and 50 USD for student members. WebbThe referee report A good referee report should have sev-eral parts. First, you should briefly state your recommendation and the reasons for it. Second, you should summarize the point of the paper in one to five sentences, both for the editor™s use and to ensure that you actually understand the paper. Third, you should evaluate the validity ...
WebbBelow, we provide a list of concepts and thoughts that referees can consider when writing a referee report. We divide the list into six main categories: (i) sufficiency of contribution, … WebbThe report for the authors should contain a reasonable rationale for your view of the paper as judged against the criteria above. It should be written constructively and politely but …
Webb20 aug. 2024 · Sorted by: 16. Resoundingly, yes. At least in my field (number theory). I just looked at the 15 most recent referee reports I received, and only 1 out of 15 of these reports avoided writing in the first person. Note: I restricted to reports on initial submissions to avoid obvious duplication of referee styles.
greatest common factor of 42 and 31WebbAcademic papers are usually sent to academic journals for publication. Once she receives a paper, the editor of a journal consults an external scholar (more commonly called “referee”) to see if the paper is suitable for publication. The referee reads the papers and writes a referee report. greatest common factor of 42 70 and 84Webb17 nov. 2024 · Editing referees' reports As part of our editorial policies, we do not edit reviewer reports and any comments that were intended for the authors are transmitted, … flipkart diwali offer siteWebbWriting a Helpful Referee's Report Authors: Brian Martin University of Wollongong Abstract Referees' reports are often demoralizing to authors. It is possible to write a report that is... greatest common factor of 42 and 21WebbYour task as a referee is to evaluate the paper and submit to the Editor an anonymous formal report accompanied by a cover letter. The Editor will forward the referees’ formal … greatest common factor of 435 and 100WebbHow to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process by Jonathan B. Berk, Campbell R. Harvey and David Hirshleifer. Published in volume 31, … greatest common factor of 42 and 66WebbIf the paper uses panel data but does not present robust and heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors, you might ask for the revision to do so. If a paper has several parts, for … flipkart diwali offers on electronics